Legion of Angels News Archive » Performance

Posts Tagged ‘Performance’

Amy Winehouse Makes Her DJ Debut At London’s Monarch Club

Monday, July 14th, 2008 AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Any time Amy Winehouse makes it through a performance these days without incident, it’s international news.

On Thursday, the British tabloid magnet hosted a night at the Camden Monarch club in her London neighborhood, where she picked out songs that inspired her career. Though Snakehips at the Monarch was billed as a DJ battle between Winehouse and her friend, Bioux, based on reports, the troubled singer didn’t exactly spin records as she stood somewhat doe-eyed in front of a huge Union Jack flag, while the crush of fans took an endless series of photos with their phones and cameras.

According to NME.com, Winehouse — wearing a pink shirt, her signature denim short-shorts and a heart printed with the name of her imprisoned husband, Blake, in her towering beehive — sauntered into the club shortly after 10 p.m. to a barrage of flashes from the paparazzi and screams of fans inside the sweaty pub. A video of the set from the BBC News shows a listless-looking Winehouse slowly shimmying to the music as fans wave cameras in the air and call her name, which occasionally elicits a smile from the singer.

NME said Winehouse appeared to be in good spirits, but she did duck backstage at points to get a break from the chaotic scene. Among the songs played over the course of the evening were the Cure’s “Love Cats,” Dexys Midnight Runners’ “Geno,” the Supremes’ “You Can’t Hurry Love” and the Specials’ “A Message to You Rudy.” The BBC reported that an actual DJ battle failed to materialize and that Winehouse mostly just swayed in place to songs played by Bioux.

“It was a really good atmosphere, but she didn’t get on the decks at all,” a fan named Anna told the BBC. “It was just the other guy. He was good, so good, but Amy didn’t start DJing at all. It was a really good environment though and although Amy wasn’t DJing, her being there gave a point to the night so it was really good. I’d go back.”

While the night was judged a success, some fans said watching Winehouse dancing behind the decks as fans stared at her all night was a bit uncomfortable. “I thought she was fantastic, but it’s just a bit sad that Amy was crowded by all the photographers,” an unnamed fan told the BBC.

The show ended shortly after 1 a.m. with Desmond Dekker’s ska classic “You Can Get It If You Really Want.”

Winehouse being Winehouse, the evening ended with a bit of a spectacle. While some tabloids ran pictures of what appeared to be remnants of white powder under the singer’s nose, most focused on the odd image of Winehouse leaving the pub with a flattened beer box in her hand, while a companion carried a table lamp.

Source — MTV

Using Employees’ E-mail Against Them

Sunday, July 13th, 2008 AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Two Bear Stearns executives learned a hard lesson this week: If you’re going to say something inappropriate, don’t write it in an e-mail.

An online exchange between fund managers Matthew Tannin and Ralph Cioffi questioned the performance of certain funds in which they were investing clients’ money. But their public comments told a different story, and now those e-mails are the smoking gun in the civil and criminal cases against them. If convicted of conspiracy and securities fraud, the two could face jail time and heavy fines.

Will employees ever learn that anything they write in an e-mail can and will be used against them?

“This stuff is obtainable, and it’s difficult to deny once it’s printed out,” says Josh Bowers, a labor lawyer in Washington, D.C.

Of course, we’re not encouraging you to behave illegally offline, either. But the risk of getting caught online is high. Employees send hundreds of e-mails daily from their work computer, and experts say they too often broach subjects that should be avoided. The most common? Sex.

Many employees write e-mails or forward jokes with sexual overtones. On the one hand, forwarded jokes are usually meant to be harmless. The danger comes, however, if a complaint against the sender is filed that may have nothing to do with the inappropriate e-mails. For example, a manager who is unhappy with her employee’s ability to meet deadlines might ask IT to monitor his e-mail transactions. It’s only then that the sexual e-mails come to light, which provide reason enough to fire an employee or even prompt legal action.

“Those e-mails can be used to show a pattern of harassment,” says Matthew Blit, a labor lawyer with Levine & Blit in New York City.

Discrimination is another dangerous topic. Blit recalls a case in which a female employee filed a lawsuit against her employer, claiming it didn’t protect her from sexual and racial discrimination. As part of the discovery process, the employer examined her outbox, and what they found seriously hurt her case. She forwarded dozens of jokes containing sexual and racial content to her brother and mother from her work computer.

“The attorney said, ‘You’re complaining you were discriminated against, but here you are sending them out yourself. Isn’t that correct?’ ” Blit says.

It’s an important message: Nothing written from your work computer–even if it was sent from a personal e-mail address–is private. Most employee handbooks include an electronic communications policy stating that any correspondence sent from an employer-owned computer belongs to the company. Before starting a job, most companies require new employees to sign the handbook and return it to human resources to prove that they’ve read and agree with it.

And technology allows employers (and prosecutors) to retain messages sent years ago. Some employers periodically scan employees’ e-mail for certain key words, like profanities, or other vocabulary that could denote violence or harassment.

Labor lawyer Patrick Boyd encourages all employees to implement what he dubs “the grandmother test.” If a topic is too embarrassing to share with your grandmother, don’t send it. It’s a tough guideline to follow, since our work and personal lives are so intertwined. We receive e-mails from family members while at the office and respond offhandedly between assignments. A lax attitude toward e-mail seeps into our interoffice communication, too.

“That’s dangerous,” Boyd says. “When you communicate something, even though you did it after giving the topic 30 seconds of thought, it can be used in a court of law years later. E-mail is perceived as casual, and it should not be.”

Even a confidential exchange between an attorney and a client isn’t protected if an e-mail is sent from a client’s work computer to her lawyer.

The Bear Stearns executives are just the latest in a long line of employees who’ve drawn negative attention–and legal trouble–for inappropriate e-mails.

Take Frank Quattrone, the investment banker from Credit Suisse First Boston who sent an e-mail to his staff with the subject line: “Time to clean up those files.” The note referred to the firm’s practice of discarding certain files and memos. Quattrone’s conviction was later overturned.

In 2002, Merrill Lynch (nyse: MER - news - people ) paid $100 million to settle a lawsuit because its analysts were making certain statements about stocks in public but whispering others behind closed doors. The private comments didn’t stay that way after analyst Henry Blodget’s e-mails were uncovered. He had given stocks “buy” ratings, but his correspondence showed he actually thought they were a “piece of junk.”

More recently, the head of mortgage lender Countrywide, Angelo Mozilo, intended to send a colleague a note deeming a borrower’s plea for help “disgusting.” Instead, he directed the e-mail back to the borrower. When the borrower went public with the news, the company was forced to confirm that the e-mail was indeed from its CEO.

It’s unlikely that particular e-mail would have passed the grandmother test. But everyone else’s definitely should.

Source — Forbes

To Beat The Heat, Learn To Sweat It Out

Friday, July 4th, 2008 AddThis Social Bookmark Button

YOU already know that if you exercise outside on hot and humid days, you should drink plenty of water. And you are probably well aware of the risk of heat stroke given the countless reports about the warning signs.

But if you’re going to be out exercising anyway, you may have different questions: How long does it take to acclimate to the heat and humidity, and what is the best way to do it? How much does your performance time slow when it is sweltering and humid, and why? Does it help to douse your head with water?

Should you go out in the morning, when it is cooler but the relative humidity is higher, or at night, when it tends to be hotter but less humid?

The answers, some exercise physiologists say, are not always what you might expect.

There is no question that heat can take a toll on performance. Look, for example, at results from races on the second weekend in June, when a heat wave gripped the Northeast.

On June 7, over 4,000 women ran the New York Mini 10-K race in Central Park. When the race began at 9 a.m., it was 71 degrees and the humidity was 78 percent. The winning time, 32 minutes 43 seconds, by Hilda Kibet, was the slowest in a decade.

“From the beginning, my legs were not really moving,” Ms. Kibet told The New York Times.

That same day in similar weather and humidity, in Cambridge, Md., nearly 1,400 athletes raced in the Eagle Man Half Ironman — a 1.2-mile swim, a 56-mile bike ride, and a 13.1-mile run. Among them was Amy Roth, 32, the director of corporate partnerships at the Whitney Museum in Manhattan. She had trained hard, but the run, in particular, was difficult in the intense heat.

“I felt like I was dragging along but I couldn’t move any faster,” Ms. Roth said.

Still, she ran at a mile pace of 8:07.

“There were very fast people, very good athletes, who were walking, who just couldn’t do it,” she said.

Afterward, some posted comments, agonizing over their sluggish times, on Slowtwitch.com. “You could see the neuroses: ‘Oh, my God, am I getting slower? What does this mean?’ ” Ms. Roth said.

The next day, 190 professional cyclists started the Philadelphia International Championship, a 156-mile race. It was 79 degrees at 9 a.m. start, and 94 degrees when the last cyclist finished in mid-afternoon. About half of the competitors dropped out. The winning time, 6:14:47, by Matti Breschel of Team CSC, based in the Netherlands, was nearly a half hour slower than last year’s time, when it was cooler and drier.

One reason performance declines on sultry, humid days is that working muscles have to compete with the skin for blood. Directing more blood to the skin removes body heat and helps keep your body’s temperature from rising to dangerous levels. But that can mean less blood reaches muscles. At the same time, when your body becomes hotter, muscle enzymes speed up, burning glycogen more rapidly, depleting stores of the sugar that the muscles use for fuel.

Until now, most studies of the effects of heat on performance used treadmills or stationary bikes. If the subjects simulated a 5-kilometer road race lasting 15 to 20 minutes, their times would be 10 percent slower at 100 degrees than at 70 degrees. The longer the subjects ran, the more the performance declined.

One concern is that studies with treadmills may not accurately reflect what happens outside on a scorching day. With no wind indoors, for example, sweat will not evaporate as effectively.

Scott Montain and Matthew R. Ely, researchers at the United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine in Natick, Mass., analyzed real-world data from seven major marathons, comparing performances over years when temperatures and humidity varied but the race course remained the same. Heat affected slower runners more, probably because they were on the course longer and ran in packs. Warm bodies close together make it harder for one’s body heat to dissipate.

An elite runner capable of finishing in less than two and a half hours on a cool day (41 to 50 degrees) would be 2.5 percent slower in warmer climes (68 to 77 degrees.) A three-hour marathoner on a cool day would be slowed by 12 percent in the heat, the researchers reported.

It may seem like a brilliant idea, then, to pour water over your head to cool down. That is what Floyd Landis did during a grueling ride on a hot day in the Alps during the 2006 Tour de France.

And last month, on that balmy Saturday, amateur runners used the same trick, dousing their heads, in an 8-kilometer race in Moorestown, N.J. Town residents also squirted runners with their garden hoses.

It is a useless ploy, said Samuel N. Cheuvront, another researcher at the Army institute. “Sweat must evaporate to provide cooling,” he said. “Dripping does not help.”

In fact, he added, if you get too wet you risk hidromeiosis, when sweat pores become blocked, which makes you even hotter.

AT least most races are held in the morning, when it is usually cooler and more humid, than later in the day, when it is hotter and drier.

Cold and humidity stresses the body less; you heat up less when it is cooler. Relative humidity may be greater on cool mornings, but what really matters for sweat evaporation is water vapor pressure. And water vapor pressure is lower when the air is cooler, meaning sweat evaporates faster.

Dr. Cheuvront said that if you have to choose between exercising in the morning when it is 60 degrees and 80 percent humidity, or in the evening when it is 90 degrees and 50 percent humidity, choose the morning.

Yet as challenging as heat and humidity are, people can acclimate. Blood volume expands, which reduces the strain on the heart from the increased demand for blood flow to the skin and muscles. And sweating increases — people who are heat adapted sweat sooner and more profusely, allowing their bodies to cool more efficiently.

For example, if you are not acclimated and run for an hour in 98-degree heat, your core temperature may go up to 103 degrees, bordering on the danger zone, said Craig Crandall, who studies heat acclimation at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. But if you are acclimated, your temperature might be 101 degrees after an hourlong run, which is well within the safety zone. Acclimation takes at least five days, Dr. Cheuvront found. He first asked participants to walk on a treadmill for 100 minutes in a room that was kept at 100 to 120 degrees.

On Day 1, Dr. Cheuvront said, they usually last 30 to 45 minutes. Then, he added, they will either request to get off the treadmill; collapse; or reach the safety-limit core temperature of 104 degrees, at which point they are stopped. By Day 5, just about everyone lasts 100 minutes.

It is possible to adapt even more. Dr. Cheuvront’s subjects continued to improve when they walked on the treadmill in that hot room for five more days.

Some people naturally adapt to heat much more than others. But Dr. Cheuvront said he had never come across a person who did not adapt at all.

The key to acclimation, he said, is to exercise in the heat daily and to be sure you are sweating profusely — wearing extra layers of clothing can help if you are exercising indoors or in cooler weather. Given a choice between spending more time in the heat but exercising less intensely, or less time and exercising more intensely, it is safer to choose to go longer and work less intensely, he said.

MS. ROTH’S impression that running was much harder than cycling in the heat was correct, physiologists say. And it is not just because there is more cooling wind when you ride. It is also because you don’t cycle upright, so your heart has less of a fight against gravity to pump blood to skin. That is especially true in the heat, when blood vessels in the legs are distended and blood tends to pool in the feet, making the flow of blood up to the head even more difficult.

But no matter how much you train in the heat, it will never be easy, athletes and researchers say. So perhaps the best strategy is to just accept discomfort and slowness.

“Heat is the X factor,” Ms. Roth said. “Sometimes you have to just forget it and move on.”

Source — The New York Times

Home Theater Projector Offers ‘Unbeatable Value’

Saturday, June 21st, 2008 AddThis Social Bookmark Button

(CNET) – Samsung’s flagship one-chip DLP-based home theater projector, the SP-A800B, takes accuracy of signal reproduction to a new level.

My previous reference projector, the Samsung SP-H710AE, was designed by Joe Kane, and that well-known video guru and author of Digital Video Essentials also designed the SP-A800B.

While the 710E is spectacularly accurate in just about every regard, the new SP-A800B surpasses its predecessor’s performance in several important areas.

First off, it has a 1080p native resolution, which becomes more important when using gigantic front-projector screen sizes.

A brighter, more stable lamp provides longer life at light levels far above those of the 710, and the lens is considerably better with far fewer chromatic aberrations.

Finally, black levels are much better in the right Iris setting.

The SP-A800B is also one of the most stylish and attractive designs in front projection.

To that add a solid feature package and good connectivity, and in the SP-A800B ($9999 list) you have an unbeatable value in the high-end projector space.

Design

Samsung has done a complete redesign on this projector. Rounded edges and a lens assembly centered on the chassis give it an extremely sleek, high-tech look. The unit is finished in a glossy black that should impress everyone, including an interior designer.

The remote control mimics the projector with its own rounded edges and black glossy finish. The medium-sized clicker fits in the hand comfortably and every key is within easy reach.

I was also very pleased to find that it is fully backlit, which is another little improvement over the previous 710 design. Also, the menu system is quite intuitive to use and easy to navigate.

Features

A strong feature package is one of the many strengths of the SP-A800B. A unique feature–one that I have yet to see on any projector in its class–is selectable color space. You have a choice of SMPTE C (for America), EBU (for Europe), and HDTV.

The best part of the feature is that all of these color spaces are pretty accurate out of the box, and scarily accurate after a service level calibration.

A total of seven picture modes seems somewhat overkill. Movie mode is the best and most accurate for out-of-the-box post-calibrated use.

The Color Pattern feature lets you isolate blue for setting color and tint properly, and shows off the excellent color decoding on the 800 by letting you isolate red and green only.

An overscan feature can be engaged to intentionally cut off the extreme edges of a cable or satellite input, to eliminate compression artifacts for example. Be careful with this though, as it appears to overscan at least 5 percent, which may be more than you want.

Three gamma settings are onboard, including Film (the best for home theater purposes), Video, and Graphic. Of course, there are the obligatory selectable color temperatures: 5500K (for Black & White), 6500K (for Color), and 8000K and 9000K for bluer grayscales.

Needless to say, the 6500K is the setting you will want to utilize the most, but being able to select 5500K for an accurate grayscale when watching a black and white source is really a plus.

Gain and Bias controls are available in the User menu for fine-tuning of the grayscale if it is necessary after the service menu calibration is completed. The Dynamic Black setting is where the adjustments for the iris reside.

These settings open and close the iris respectively for balancing good blacks with an acceptable amount of light output. I found that the Middle setting produced the best compromise.

I would stay away from Auto, which will open and close the iris depending on how bright the content of the picture is. The Off and Light settings produce brighter pictures with severely compromised black level performance, while the Deep setting produces the best blacks, but with an unacceptably dim picture on my 80-inch wide (92-inch diagonal) Stewart Grayhawk RS screen.

The SP-A800B does have vertical lens shift, but not horizontal, which I found a bit disappointing at its price range.

Connectivity is fairly generous, with two HDMI and two component video inputs heading up the list. Of course, there are S-Video and composite inputs (one of each) on tap for legacy formats such as VHS and Laserdisc.

There is also a 15-pin VGA style input for use with a PC. Last but not least, an RS-232 port is on tap, which will enable custom installers to program the projector’s functions into a touch-panel remote system like a Crestron or AMX.

Performance

Samsung is one of the few companies with the foresight to hire a master video display consultant to help it design a product. This is now the fourth front projector that Joe Kane of Joe Kane Productions has had a hand in designing with Samsung, and each new effort surpasses the last.

The overall picture quality of the SP-A800B is superior to anything at or near its price range, including the more-expensive Sony VPL-VW200 SXRD projector I reviewed back in December 2007. Gamma, primary colors, and grayscale accuracy are all also superior to the Sony.

The SP-A800B improves on previous designs in several key areas of performance. First off, the lens is far superior to anything the company has used to date. The lamp is now brighter and light falloff is dramatically better than with the previous 710. Blacks are also significantly improved over the last 720p resolution model.

Color fidelity is unmatched by any projector at or near its price range, both straight out of the box prior to professional calibration, and, of course, after fine-tuning of the primary colors and grayscale with a service level calibration.

Samsung has chosen wisely to incorporate a Texas Instruments utility for primary color correction, which most manufacturers don’t bother to do (probably because of additional expense in the light engine).

This utility lets technicians dial in the primary colors, which in turn corrects the secondary colors, to near perfection. This feature, when combined with accurate color decoding, excellent gamma, and a flat, accurate grayscale, helps make the SP-A800B capable of delivering astonishingly accurate and engrossing pictures.

Video processing on the SP-A800B is also superb. Deinterlacing of 1080i sources is excellent, and artifacts are kept to a minimum.

I began my evaluation of the SP-A800B alone without an external video processor, and was quite impressed with its performance as far as video processing is concerned. It handled film- and video-based test patterns from the Silicon Optix HQV test disc quite well. I then finished my evaluations with the DVDO VP50Pro, which is my current reference video processor.

Watching cable HDTV channels in the weeks leading up to this review, I was immediately impressed with the SP-A800B. The Yankees on the YES channel here in New York never looked better. There was great snap to the picture indicating excellent contrast ratio, and skin tones and colors in general were uncannily realistic.

The projector also handles standard definition signals well. I have the HDMI output of my Time Warner cable box set to “native,” which means the cable box leaves all the scaling and processing to the projector. I also love being able to select the 5500K color temperature setting for those old black and white gems on Turner Classic Movies.

Moving on to Blu-ray, I initially watched the opening scenes of “Blade Runner: The Director’s Cut,” a black level torture test for any projector. The night shots of a futuristic Los Angeles revealed excellent shadow detail and depth on the Samsung.

Blacks were quite compelling, and low-level noise was also at a minimum. A few chapters in, when Decker first meets Rachel, you can see the super fine detail in her black dress even in the dimmer parts of the scene, which is a real testament to the SP-A800B’s ability to render shadow detail.

For brighter material, I turned to the excellent transfer on Blu-ray of “The Departed.” The opening scene on this disc in the diner can test how well 24 frames per second is implemented on a display.

I must say that the sharp right to left pan inside the diner when the young girl comes down the counter to meet Jack Nicholson looked smoother and more filmlike on the SP-A800B than on any other display I have seen recently.

This disc also showed off the SP-A800B’s 1080p resolution unmarred because of its competent scaling, and preserved by an excellent lens, both of which are common problems that rob a significant amount of resolution from many of the competing projectors I’ve seen in this price range.

Source — CNN